docwebster ([personal profile] docwebster) wrote2004-02-04 11:49 pm

THAT sure didn't take long.

Looks President Flightsuit and his Religious Reich buddies are a little peeved by Massachusetts.

Right. Judges don't get to define marriage. Only religious freakoid slime-licking purulent wastes of cellular matter on an intellectual plateau with, say, decaying goat cheese do.

Right. THIS has to take precedence over getting our men and women out of Iraqandrollallnight right along with investigating You Know Who's tits.

November can't get here fast enough.

Re:

[identity profile] drdemure.livejournal.com 2004-02-05 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)
If I recall correctly from the failed EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT for women (can you tell I'm still pissed?), you need 31 states to pass a constitutional amendment. Last time I checked, judges don't generally rule arbitrarily. They apply the law and legal precedents in their rulings. This is not the definition of the word "arbitrary". Once again, Mr. Bush proves that he was not paying attention in school. Too bad there was no "No Child Left Behind" program when *he* was in school. He was obviously left WAY behind.

If you're still not pissed off enough at Bush, check out what I just posted in my LJ today. more outrageousness

Re:

[identity profile] oceansedge.livejournal.com 2004-02-05 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Ghods that's just plain SCARY.... makes me all the more glad to be a Canadian... grant you we ain't perfect by any means... but ... DAMN!