[identity profile] worldmage.livejournal.com 2004-02-29 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Pfeh. The bill's a red herring. Any alteration to the powers of the Supreme Court would require a Constitutional Amendment. It would be kind of amusing, though, to watch them pass the bill only to watch the Supreme Court declare it unconstitutional.
ext_85396: (Default)

[identity profile] unixronin.livejournal.com 2004-03-01 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
Just as a wild-ass thought ............ you don't suppose they're TRYING to provoke a Second American Revolution, do you?

(FWIW, according to Robert A. heinlein, it's not due for another 71 years.)