docwebster ([personal profile] docwebster) wrote2004-08-09 10:54 am

The greatest threat to our freedom, apparently

Is them durn hom'sexuals. Why, just ask former U.S. Rep. Tom Coburn from Oklahoma. He'll tell you!

"The gay community has infiltrated the very centers of power in every area across this country, and they wield extreme power. ... That agenda is the greatest threat to our freedom that we face today. Why do you think we see the rationalization for abortion and multiple sexual partners? That's a gay agenda.'" - Tom Coburn, republican US Senate candidate from Oklahoma

Well, Tom honey, if multiple sexual partners is a gay agenda, then myself and a goodly portion of the people I know are queer as tits on a toothbrush. So slap my butt and call me Judy! (sighs and waits for the inevitable spirited responses from the peanut gallery)

(Snagged from the wise and holy Eschaton.)

[identity profile] bunyip.livejournal.com 2004-08-09 04:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Morning, Judy :)

[identity profile] janetmiles.livejournal.com 2004-08-09 04:11 pm (UTC)(link)
"tits on a toothbrush"? Okay, that's a new one to me.
ext_83052: (Default)

[identity profile] wikkidpixie.livejournal.com 2004-08-09 04:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Is there some sort of 'mulitple sexual partners' referendum I missed??

[identity profile] meglimir.livejournal.com 2004-08-09 04:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Abortion is a "gay" agenda? That's a new one ...

[identity profile] pagawne.livejournal.com 2004-08-09 04:45 pm (UTC)(link)
If their One True God is that narrow minded, that afraid of differences (that He created), and of everythng else, it seems, I think I'll try the Second True God. He seems much more reasonable, and understands we can not truely see all His purposes.

[identity profile] ceruleanst.livejournal.com 2004-08-09 04:55 pm (UTC)(link)
It seems to me that homosexuals wouldn't have much of a personal stake in abortion, seeing as how it would take truly extraordinary circumstances to ever put them in a position to need one.

[identity profile] hiddenmuse.livejournal.com 2004-08-09 08:34 pm (UTC)(link)
*scratches head*

Abortions + Multiple Sex Partners = Gay Agenda

Really now? And I always thought the Gay Agenda was just "Get up, go to work, mojitos at Happy Hour ... with the main objective being to not get beaten up or killed!" Dammit, I've had it wrong all this time!

Guess that means that I should scrap that happy queer girl monogamous life, to live the "true gay agenda". ;)

[identity profile] kittyvamp.livejournal.com 2004-08-09 09:38 pm (UTC)(link)
*smacks your ass*
hi judy :P

[identity profile] beki.livejournal.com 2004-08-10 01:23 am (UTC)(link)
*SCHWACK*

Hey Judy what's shakin? :)

[identity profile] darthgeek.livejournal.com 2004-08-10 02:50 am (UTC)(link)

Gay agenda

[identity profile] serenarayn.livejournal.com 2004-08-10 02:59 am (UTC)(link)
You know... had i known there was an actual agenda to being even slightly attracted to the other sex i think i would have leaped at it a hell of a long time ago. *shakes head* abortion came up originally for those who never wanted children like prostitutes and crack whores unfortunately its true the only good reasons for it really was accidental pregnancy and no other way out and./ or rape. im a pro choice so it brings up a whole ball for me. On the multiple partner thing its bullshizzy i will not ever believe it in my entire life for im happily in a monogamous relationship with a man currently and we occaisionally experiment no man cant say he hasnt thought of another female in bed with his girl except for our gay friends out there. On the other note Im bi so i swing both ways and i have no agenda sorry you *insert long line of explicit content here* politicions but i dont want to hear it anymore.

there i think i feel better...
*Hugs Doc* *Spanks Judy* ;)

[identity profile] weekendwench.livejournal.com 2004-08-10 04:29 pm (UTC)(link)
A spanking! A spanking! and then.....the oral sex!