docwebster ([personal profile] docwebster) wrote2004-08-12 02:07 pm

Oh, motherfuckers.. this shit is ON.

First we have Vice Preznit Cheney blasting Kerry's "sensitive" remarks about the war, all the while ignoring the Preznit's remarkably similar remarks from March of 2001 wherein Preznit Bucky The Wonder Chimp said the U.S. must be "sensitive about expressing our power and influence."

If anybody feels the need to spout some crapola here about that was before the events of That Day, save it. I'm not interested.

Then there's this post which absolutely beggars description.

Finally, of course, there's the California Supreme Court caving in to the Religious Reich. I hope every last one of the black robed sonsofbitches burns in hell.

People, when the fuck are we going to throw off this yoke of government imposed fear and paranoia and lay the smackdown on these silly bastards?

I'll tell you when.

November.

Tick tock, motherfuckers. Tick tock.

[identity profile] nsingman.livejournal.com 2004-08-12 07:35 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm a libertarian who firmly believes that as long as the parties are all consenting adults, the state has no business determining what is or is not a valid domestic arrangement. The sexes and number of the partners is irrelevant. Period. That said, the California Supreme Court's decision was probably the right one. Mayor Newsome was in violation of the law, and had no right to act unilaterally and illegally in his capacity as mayor.

In addition, unless you're willing to call the vast majority of your fellow citizens members of the "Religious Reich," you might want to rethink your assessment of the California Supremes as having "caved." I think the majority is often wrong, and they're wrong on this issue, but a large majority of Americans (including the man you want to be president) think gay marriage is simply wrong. Is John Kerry part of the Religious Reich's vanguard?

[identity profile] thatvoiceguy.livejournal.com 2004-08-12 09:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Wonder when the Bush admin will start crowing about "activist judges" re: the CA case?

Any second now, I'm sure.

</ sarcasm>

[identity profile] beanrua.livejournal.com 2004-08-12 09:39 pm (UTC)(link)
It was pretty chilling what I saw on nightline last night.

The media is spreading terrorism fear of voting...there is apparently "creditable threat" to polling places and candidates.

This is a f-ed up world we are living in.
ext_132442: (Default)

california ruling..

[identity profile] scar4711.livejournal.com 2004-08-12 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)
before you get up in arms about this.. the Justices were only doing their job.. interpeting the law..

CA law prohibits same sex marriages.. the court had to uphold that law.

They also said that it is up to the lower courts to decide on the constitutionality of this law.

ext_74: Baron Samadai in cat form (Default)

[identity profile] siliconshaman.livejournal.com 2004-08-13 07:38 am (UTC)(link)
I am curious about one thing Doc...

Assuming that Bucky the Wonder Chimp [love that!] manages to get himself back into office in November, what then ?

Not that I think he will [I hope] but I believe in contingency planning.