docwebster ([personal profile] docwebster) wrote2004-09-26 10:47 am

Snagged from [livejournal.com profile] babylon_fading via <user site="livejournal.com" us

Dan Rather, CBS News Anchor
1) given documents he thought were true
2) failed to thoroughly investigate the facts
3) reported documents to the American people as true to make his case
4) when confronted with the facts: apologized and launched an investigation
5) number of Americans dead: 0
6) remedy: should be fired as CBS News Anchor

George W. Bush, President of the United States
1) given documents he thought were true
2) failed to thoroughly investigate the facts
3) reported documents to the American people as true to make his case
4) when confronted with the facts: continued to report untruth and stonewalled an investigation
5) number of Americans dead: 1100
6) remedy: should be given four more years as President of the United States

How's that, again?

[identity profile] bludfeast.livejournal.com 2004-09-26 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Y'kno what would make the whole process a shitload more honest and make the fuckburgers who run a helluvsa lot more careful once they get into office?

6 year term, NO Re-elections! One-shot deal. And if you fuck up, there should also be a tribunal at the end of each presidency to determine if the president should be lauded or prosecuted.

I'm sick-to-tits with the whole process as it is... I think we should have a "Clean-slate" election, nation wide, No Incumbents allowed!