ext_4734 ([identity profile] lubedpumpkin.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] docwebster 2005-03-04 02:51 am (UTC)

Oh the Bill of Rights? Technically he's wrong then. =)

The absolutist view of the Constitution would follow "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" to a T. NO law whatsoever.

Unfortunately, to my knowledge only Scalia and.. some other one, one of the lesser famous ones considers themselves to be absolutist.

I think the SC would agree with Tom, unfortunately. And historically, there have been *many* laws dealing with religion, religious practice, and display.

[Not that I think it's right. I don't. Just sayin'.]

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting