[personal profile] docwebster
Think again:

Ministers charged for marrying gay couples in New York, AP says.


Two New York Ministers Charged for Marrying Gay Couples

The Associated Press
Monday, March 15, 2004; 2:05 PM


KINGSTON, N.Y. -- Two ministers were charged Monday for marrying 13 gay couples, thrusting the clergy into the legal battle over gay marriage in what is believed to be the first such prosecution for performing same-sex ceremonies.

Unitarian Universalist ministers Kay Greenleaf and Dawn Sangrey were charged with multiple counts of solemnizing a marriage without a license, the same charges leveled against New Paltz Mayor Jason West, who last month drew the state into the widening national debate over same-sex unions.

The charges may be the first brought against clergy for performing same-sex unions, according to the Human Rights Campaign, a Washington, D.C.-based gay rights group.

"As far as I know that's unprecedented," said Mark Shields a spokesman for the Human Rights Campaign. "It's ridiculous that prosecutors would spend their time charging anyone with a crime who is simply trying to unite two people with basic rights and protections."

Greenleaf, who acknowledged performing the ceremonies in New Paltz knowing the couples did not have licenses, said she signed an affidavit for the couples and considers the ceremonies civil.

Ulster County District Attorney Donald Williams said gay marriage laws make no distinction between public officials and members of the clergy who preside over wedding ceremonies.

Williams said he decided to press charges because the marriages were "drastically different" from religious ceremonies because Greenleaf and Sangrey publicly said they considered them civil. Some Unitarian ministers, Greenleaf included, have been performing ceremonies for gay couples since before the issue entered the national debate.

"It is not our intention to interfere with anyone's right to express their religious beliefs, including the right of members of the clergy to perform ceremonies where couples are united solely in the eyes of the church or any other faith," Williams said.

Williams had said before Monday's charges were announced that it would be more difficult considering charges against clergy because the clergy had not sworn to uphold the law.

He said his decision to press charges was influenced by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer's opinion that gay marriage is illegal in New York and by the injunction issued by a state supreme court justice against West.

The ministers performed the weddings March 6.

On Saturday, Greenleaf and Sangrey were joined by a third minister, the Rev. Marion Visel, in performing 25 more ceremonies, which went off without protests or arrests. It could not immediately be learned if more charges would be brought.

The ministers' lawyer, Robert Gottlieb, was unaware of the charges when contacted by The Associated Press and declined immediate comment.

Since West joined San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom as the only elected officials to marry gay couples, the issue has spread rapidly across the country. Courts, legislatures and elected officials are wrestling with what supporters say is a matter of civil rights and opponents call an attack on the time-honored institution of marriage.

West married 25 gay and lesbian couples Feb. 27 in a highly publicized marathon ceremony. West is now under a court order temporarily halting the weddings.

The charges carry a fine of $25 to $500 or jail time.


The Religious/Far Reich needs to be slapped down, and it needs to be slapped down hard. November can't get here fast enough.

I should add that the above was snagged from the ever-redoubtable [livejournal.com profile] sinboy.

Date: 2004-03-15 02:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madsqueeble.livejournal.com
[quote]"It is not our intention to interfere with anyone's right to express their religious beliefs, including the right of members of the clergy to perform ceremonies where couples are united solely in the eyes of the church or any other faith," Williams said.[/quote]

...Eeeeyeahhhh. I'm SURE.

If it's not about repression, it's a case of severely misguided priorities. Can we please concentrate on your War on Terror so we can get some sleep at night again?

Date: 2004-03-15 07:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] borogove13.livejournal.com
Yet another good reason why civil union should be adopted as the only form of legal union between any two people, and should be completely seperated from marriage as a religious ceremony. People already have to be licensed to be married, extend that to a notarized certificate of union and apply that to any concenting couple that isn't immediately related by blood who want legal status as a union (legally nothing at all to do with sanctity or love or familly, just with property and legal status and benefits). Then if someone wants a spiritual ceremony linking them in that way, they can get it as well. They could even work the notarization of the document into the religious ceremony if they felt like it, but this has been a horrible violation of the seperation of church and state for too long and should have been changed long before homosexual marriage made it a huge issue.

March 2016

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 13th, 2025 11:01 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios