File this under "God, but I hate neo-cons"

[docwebster]

(snagged from sinboy)

"So let's be clear what's going on here. As we speak, 138,000 Americans are serving under dangerous conditions in Iraq. And our forces in Karbala are fighting against the goons and thugs of Muqtada al-Sadr with some success. They're risking their lives for freedom and honor and duty and love of country.

And conventional liberal opinion wants them to lose."

Utter bullshit, but I shouldn't expect anything less.

Get this through your thick skulls: being against the war does NOT automatically mean, in any form or fashion, that we (a) want the US to lose (what puerile, jingoistic bullshit) or (b) we don't support the troops.

Fscking morons.

Comments

[griffen.livejournal.com]

Oh, but didn't you know, Doc? Liberals never want simple answers to complicated questions, and conservatives never want complicated answers to simple questions.

*spit*

Love my country, fear my government.

[ministerofsilly.livejournal.com]

Yeah, no shit. I'd argue that being against the war means we support our troops MORE because we didn't want them put in harms way in the FIRST DAMN PLACE.