[personal profile] docwebster
The magazine's editors tapped Bush "for sharpening the debate until the choices bled, for reframing reality to match his design, for gambling his fortunes — and ours — on his faith in the power of leadership."

I think I'm going to vomit. Yeah, I know Hitler and Stalin were both Man Of The Year (Stalin twice, yet), but all that miserable filth needs is more of an ego boost.

Date: 2004-12-19 05:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] necrotica.livejournal.com
I know, I saw that and just about choked.

Date: 2004-12-19 05:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] murphymom.livejournal.com
Excuse me while I go hurl....

"The circle is now complete"

Date: 2004-12-19 06:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] midnightmadness.livejournal.com
Holy Gawd, can we possbily mirror late 1930's Germany ANY more?

Re: "The circle is now complete"

Date: 2004-12-20 01:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] damienps.livejournal.com
Galloping inflation is next :D

Date: 2004-12-19 08:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] foxsynergy.livejournal.com
Hours after I got the news, and I'm still aghast.

Date: 2004-12-19 08:50 pm (UTC)

Date: 2004-12-20 01:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] greyman.livejournal.com
You do realize that "Man of the Year" is not automatically a *positive* thing... but Time votes for the "most influential" force in the year's events?

(sometimes the Time Man of the Year hasn't even been human)

Date: 2004-12-23 02:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theballistics13.livejournal.com
And again this year that is the case.

http://www.bushflash.com/idiot.html

Date: 2004-12-20 06:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madsqueeble.livejournal.com
I almost hurled my dinner right across the room when i heard.
Page generated Aug. 13th, 2025 07:16 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios