Profile
docwebster
Page Summary
sirensong666.livejournal.com - (no subject)
meglimir.livejournal.com - (no subject)
madsqueeble.livejournal.com - (no subject)
siliconshaman.livejournal.com - (no subject)
qatobo.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sirensong666.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kittenpants.livejournal.com - (no subject)
inkmistress.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2005-01-30 11:47 pm (UTC)That is absurd! (Obviously.)
Am I the only one who remembers that JESUS was an advocate for prostitutes, lepers, and other outcasts?
I am not even Christian, and I can smell the bullshit! What happened to "Love thy neighbor"?
I swear, Catholics have to be one tiny step closer to the Judeo-Christian God than Satanists, considering how far their policies fall from the basic tenets of Christianity.
We are all going to Hell... oops, it seems we are here already.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-30 11:50 pm (UTC)Yup. Amen.
Date: 2005-01-31 10:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-30 11:48 pm (UTC)Is the Hippocratic Oath truly about to become a hypocritic oath?
no subject
Date: 2005-01-30 11:50 pm (UTC)Damn shit straight it is!
no subject
Date: 2005-01-31 02:42 am (UTC)They're also making it illegal to refuse treatment on the ground "they're gay"...
So how long do you think before Bush&co are advocating forced euthanasia of all the gays ?
no subject
Date: 2005-01-31 06:34 am (UTC)I'm thinking you're probably correct, since I also remember reading a lot of personal ads from lesbians seeking gay men to donate sperm for their IVF. That combined with the scientific studies indicating that a tendency towards homosexuality might be genetically based has to be terrifying to the neo-con fucktards.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-31 06:31 am (UTC)Both articles are about bullshit policy. If you can base a decision to refuse non-emergency treatment based on your religious beliefs, I can't wait for the first time a member of "The Church of the Creator" refuses to help a black person as it's against the doctor's religion. I'm agreeing with someone in
no subject
Date: 2005-01-31 07:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-31 11:56 am (UTC)Wow. This also means that doctors could refuse service to menstruating women, if their religion finds them "unclean". This means that doctors can also refuse service to Jews and gypsies. Not that I'm trying to draw any parallels.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-31 01:29 pm (UTC)Personally, I think the source site of this information is a little biased (not saying that they don't have a right to be, mind) and may be "padded" for shock value. I'd like to see the information posted elsewhere (like a legit news source) before taking it as gospel.
and after pondering over a few more sips of coffee
Date: 2005-01-31 01:39 pm (UTC)