docwebster ([personal profile] docwebster) wrote2005-03-16 07:32 pm

Just for the record?

I don't give a shit if Han shot first or not.

[identity profile] thatvoiceguy.livejournal.com 2005-03-17 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
Well, I do. Dammit.




/still friends?

[identity profile] rsmit212.livejournal.com 2005-03-17 02:30 am (UTC)(link)

I agree that it's not big enough to argue about. In my opinion, Han shooting first makes more sense. *shrug*

[identity profile] popefelix.livejournal.com 2005-03-17 04:16 am (UTC)(link)
Everybody knows the bartender did it, and blamed it on Han.

[identity profile] damienps.livejournal.com 2005-03-17 07:50 am (UTC)(link)
I'd sure as hell shoot first with someone threating me like happened with Han.

[identity profile] kittenpants.livejournal.com 2005-03-17 08:11 am (UTC)(link)
That's what they WANT you to think, man! There were *multiple shooters*, including Zuckuss on the grassy knoll, and the CIA operative Wuher was behind the bar at the time. Han and Lee Harvey Oswald were just pawns in a larger game run by the KGB, Jabba the Hut, and the Wookiee Liberation Front.

Google is a dangerous thing in the hands of the sleep-deprived.