Just for the record?

[docwebster]

I don't give a shit if Han shot first or not.

Comments

[thatvoiceguy.livejournal.com]

Well, I do. Dammit.




/still friends?

[docwebster.livejournal.com]

*laugh* Sure.

[murnkay.livejournal.com]

Not caring about Han means the terrorists win :(

[docwebster.livejournal.com]

Whether he shot first or not doesn't matter. Which one of those mothers walked out of the bar in one piece? I rest my case. ;)

[unixronin.livejournal.com]

There is that. What I object to about it is the revisionism for the sake of political correctness -- "Good guys don't shoot first." As counter to which, there is the maxim that violence is the last resort of the incompetent, whereas the competent recognize the need for it much sooner and do something about it right away.

[foxsynergy.livejournal.com]

Damn tootin'. Wouldn't have been quite as bad if the bastardization had been less obvious. Then again, oh -- don't let's start. :P

[rsmit212.livejournal.com]

I agree that it's not big enough to argue about. In my opinion, Han shooting first makes more sense. *shrug*

[popefelix.livejournal.com]

Everybody knows the bartender did it, and blamed it on Han.

[damienps.livejournal.com]

I'd sure as hell shoot first with someone threating me like happened with Han.

[kittenpants.livejournal.com]

That's what they WANT you to think, man! There were *multiple shooters*, including Zuckuss on the grassy knoll, and the CIA operative Wuher was behind the bar at the time. Han and Lee Harvey Oswald were just pawns in a larger game run by the KGB, Jabba the Hut, and the Wookiee Liberation Front.

Google is a dangerous thing in the hands of the sleep-deprived.

[triadruid.livejournal.com]

Back, and to the left... back, and to the left...