Account name:
Password
(OpenID?)
(Forgot it?)
Remember Me
You're viewing
docwebster
's journal
Create a Dreamwidth Account
Learn More
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
Reload page in style:
site
light
Santo contra Las Momias De Internet
That's that.
That's that.
Mar
.
24th
,
2005
09:48 am
docwebster
Hot off the press - the Supremes refuse to intervene. The decision to remove the tube stands.
Current Mood:
tired
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
Date:
2005-03-24 03:51 pm (UTC)
From:
midnightmadness.livejournal.com
Damn activist judges!!!
no subject
Date:
2005-03-24 03:54 pm (UTC)
From:
yendi
That actually impresses me a little -- since I think it still only takes two Supremes to decide to hear a case, that means that even Scalia and his butt-buddy didn't go for this one.
no subject
Date:
2005-03-24 03:58 pm (UTC)
From:
yendi
Never mind -- looks like it was Kennedy who decided not to hear it, as emergencies just go to one justice, it seems.
no subject
Date:
2005-03-24 04:05 pm (UTC)
From:
docwebster.livejournal.com
I'm looking forward to the Freepers going slugnutty over this.
no subject
Date:
2005-03-24 05:15 pm (UTC)
From:
gridlore.livejournal.com
Actually he did pass the decision onto the full court.. and they decided, for the fifth time, not to get involved.
no subject
Date:
2005-03-24 04:14 pm (UTC)
From:
nsingman.livejournal.com
Hotter off the press -
the Florida state courts are involved again
.
no subject
Date:
2005-03-24 04:53 pm (UTC)
From:
bunyip.livejournal.com
Sadly, not a surprise
no subject
Date:
2005-03-24 04:21 pm (UTC)
From:
lbcboy232.livejournal.com
thank god. this whole thing is so pathetic.
it's pissed me off almost to the point of a ranting political entry, but i usually leaves those up to you ;)
no subject
Date:
2005-03-24 04:52 pm (UTC)
From:
bunyip.livejournal.com
I thought this would happen, but the screams of judicial tyrany* etc will be forthcoming.
* Religious Right code word for we don't like this decision because it goes against what our bible says, see also judicial activism </sarcasm>
no subject
Date:
2005-03-24 04:52 pm (UTC)
From:
auryn29a.livejournal.com
My first thought: "Huh? What does Diana Ross have to do with it?"
no subject
Date:
2005-03-24 07:47 pm (UTC)
From:
drake57.livejournal.com
Yeah i didn't think Diana Ross would make a decision...
no subject
Date:
2005-03-24 07:59 pm (UTC)
From:
electramyst.livejournal.com
Well, Mary Wilson never liked Diana. She still blames her for the death of florence. I bet that has something to do with it.
12 comments
Reply
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Profile
docwebster
Radio Nosferatu
Recent Entries
Archive
Reading
Tags
Memories
Profile
March
2016
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Most Popular Tags
show
-
1 use
Page Summary
midnightmadness.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
yendi
-
(no subject)
nsingman.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
lbcboy232.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
bunyip.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
auryn29a.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
drake57.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
Style Credit
Style:
by
timeasmymeasure
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 22nd, 2025 04:53 pm
Powered by
Dreamwidth Studios
no subject
no subject
Date: 2005-03-24 03:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-24 03:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-24 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-24 05:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-24 04:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-24 04:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-24 04:21 pm (UTC)it's pissed me off almost to the point of a ranting political entry, but i usually leaves those up to you ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-03-24 04:52 pm (UTC)* Religious Right code word for we don't like this decision because it goes against what our bible says, see also judicial activism </sarcasm>
no subject
Date: 2005-03-24 04:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-24 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-24 07:59 pm (UTC)