docwebster ([personal profile] docwebster) wrote2005-03-24 09:48 am
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry
  • Current Mood: tired

That's that.

Hot off the press - the Supremes refuse to intervene. The decision to remove the tube stands.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only
yendi: (Default)

[personal profile] yendi 2005-03-24 03:54 pm (UTC)(link)
That actually impresses me a little -- since I think it still only takes two Supremes to decide to hear a case, that means that even Scalia and his butt-buddy didn't go for this one.
yendi: (Default)

[personal profile] yendi 2005-03-24 03:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Never mind -- looks like it was Kennedy who decided not to hear it, as emergencies just go to one justice, it seems.

[identity profile] docwebster.livejournal.com 2005-03-24 04:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm looking forward to the Freepers going slugnutty over this.

[identity profile] gridlore.livejournal.com 2005-03-24 05:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Actually he did pass the decision onto the full court.. and they decided, for the fifth time, not to get involved.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only