*sigh* Well, we need to get this out of our systems and support the show. That's the main thing. Just please give us a real Doctor for 11? Like, say, ME?
Because he's a fan of the show who knows what he's fucking well getting into, and won't start whining about "typecasting" the minute after his first episode airs?
Oh, wait - that was my outside voice again, wasn't it?
Okay, disclaimer first, this is about 3/4 theorising and 1/4 fact.
Ecclstone has pointed out in a recent interview that the BBC's press release that he was leaving because he didn't want to get typecast is largely untrue, and in fact it was their decision not to renew his contract. he's since shut about it due to legal reasons.
The BBC is contracted to produce 4 series, or Doctors 9&10 whichever comes first.
The head of the BBC has publically stated that he does not like sci-fi and particually doesn't like Dr Who. He would prefer the money went elsewhere.
Logical conclusion: The head of the BBC reluctantly gave way to public and internal pressures to do a new series of Dr Who, but is trying to kill it first by putting Eccleston as the Doctor, but he turned out to be successful so he was dropped.
Now he's putting this guy in the role, partly with the hope of turning off the fans, and partly because he hopes to be able to get rid of him as easily and therefore cancel the show because of the subclause to the contract.
Either way, once again the personal prefferances of the head of the BBC matters more than that of the viewers. Once again Auntie BBC is being run as someone's personal petty kingdom rather than a public company with a duty to provide what the customer wants.
[which incidently is why Dr Who got cancelled in the first place and it's funding went to televise more snooker. The DG was a snooker fan.]
no subject
Date: 2005-04-16 05:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-16 05:07 am (UTC)But for the love of all that's holy, sacred and true the Doctor should NOT look like his companion could kick his ass, never mind the Daleks!
no subject
Date: 2005-04-16 05:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-16 05:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-16 05:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-16 08:21 am (UTC)Don't ask me why I'm being such a snarky bitch tonight. I didn't even drink at the party I went to....
no subject
Date: 2005-04-16 08:21 am (UTC)Oh, wait - that was my outside voice again, wasn't it?
no subject
Date: 2005-04-16 06:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-16 01:39 pm (UTC)I bet he won't give Rose any lip.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-16 10:06 am (UTC)Ecclstone has pointed out in a recent interview that the BBC's press release that he was leaving because he didn't want to get typecast is largely untrue, and in fact it was their decision not to renew his contract. he's since shut about it due to legal reasons.
The BBC is contracted to produce 4 series, or Doctors 9&10 whichever comes first.
The head of the BBC has publically stated that he does not like sci-fi and particually doesn't like Dr Who. He would prefer the money went elsewhere.
Logical conclusion: The head of the BBC reluctantly gave way to public and internal pressures to do a new series of Dr Who, but is trying to kill it first by putting Eccleston as the Doctor, but he turned out to be successful so he was dropped.
Now he's putting this guy in the role, partly with the hope of turning off the fans, and partly because he hopes to be able to get rid of him as easily and therefore cancel the show because of the subclause to the contract.
Either way, once again the personal prefferances of the head of the BBC matters more than that of the viewers. Once again Auntie BBC is being run as someone's personal petty kingdom rather than a public company with a duty to provide what the customer wants.
[which incidently is why Dr Who got cancelled in the first place and it's funding went to televise more snooker. The DG was a snooker fan.]