[personal profile] docwebster
Dear Mr. President:
The American Legion, a wartime veterans organization of nearly three-million members, urges the immediate withdrawal of American troops participating in "Operation Allied Force.''

The National Executive Committee of The American Legion, meeting in Indianapolis today, adopted Resolution 44, titled "The American Legion's Statement on Yugoslavia.'' This resolution was debated and adopted unanimously.

Mr. President, the United States Armed Forces should never be committed to wartime operations unless the following conditions are fulfilled:


That there be a clear statement by the President of why it is in our vital national interests to be engaged in hostilities;

Guidelines be established for the mission, including a clear exit strategy;

That there be support of the mission by the U.S. Congress and the American people; and

That it be made clear that U.S. Forces will be commanded only by U.S. officers whom we acknowledge are superior military leaders.
It is the opinion of The American Legion, which I am sure is shared by the majority of Americans, that three of the above listed conditions have not been met in the current joint operation with NATO ("Operation Allied Force'').

In no case should America commit its Armed Forces in the absence of clearly defined objectives agreed upon by the U.S. Congress in accordance with Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution of the United States.

Sincerely,
Harold L. "Butch'' Miller,
National Commander

American Legion
Letter to President Clinton
May 5, 1999

Date: 2005-08-25 12:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sedshe.livejournal.com
Niiiiice. (Hi. I don't think I've visited here before.)

Have you seen this one? My apologies if you have:

I cannot support a failed foreign policy. History teaches us that it is often easier to make war than peace. This administration is just learning that lesson right now. The President began this mission with very vague objectives and lots of unanswered questions. A month later, these questions are still unanswered. There are no clarified rules of engagement. There is no timetable. There is no legitimate definition of victory. There is no contingency plan for mission creep. There is no clear funding program. There is no agenda to bolster our over-extended military. There is no explanation defining what vital national interests are at stake. There was no strategic plan for war when the President started this thing, and there still is no plan today."

-- Tom DeLay. Floor statement, 4/28/99

Date: 2005-08-25 01:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sedshe.livejournal.com
Ah, I've just read back through your journal a bit, and I see you posted that yourself last week. Sorry.

The hypocrisy - it burns!

Date: 2005-08-25 01:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] docwebster.livejournal.com
Doesn't it just? Feel free to stop in any old time.

Date: 2005-08-25 08:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nsingman.livejournal.com
Unsurprising, but another instructive example of how Republican sympathizers are just as hypocritical as Democratic sympathizers. Depending on who's holding the reins, they simply swap scripts.

Date: 2005-08-25 10:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mimisoliel.livejournal.com
Wow... It figures.

When Clinton was warning about Al Queda, these people were going on about it being a smokescreen from the "more imortant issue", Monika Lewinsky.

March 2016

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 13th, 2025 04:09 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios