[personal profile] docwebster
Caveat: The following represents nothing more than itches of the intellect, and as I'm already in a particularly foul mood anyway, please take it with a large grain of salt, or I will be forced to tie a knot in your trachea. Thank you.



Christmas.

You know, I'm not by any means a stereotypical Christian. Not even close, it must be said. But I do get mightily annoyed when people don't treat it with as much respect as they would like for their religion, or lack thereof as the case may be. If you want respect, you give respect. Otherwise, kindly shut your cake hole. Hypocrisy doesn't wear well on anyone, least of all people who presumably have an intelligence quotient somewhat above that of a squashed gnat.

There is one extremely dear person whose journal shall remain nameless (because this person truly is very cool, but if they choose to react to this, it's not my place to say them nay) who had , in their journal, one of the most condescending things I've ever read. To wit, referring to Christ as "An imaginary friend". In other words, if you believe in Christ you're displaying the approximate maturity of a preschooler. Nice.

I reiterate: it's perfectly okay if you don't believe. It's perfectly okay if your religion of choice is worshipping a left handed Albanian dentist from Newark named Morty. But do *not* look down your nose at those who believe in Christ, simply because they believe in the brand that's been (arguably) number one on the metaphysical hit parade for a couple millenia or so.

And don't come to me with "Well the Christian religion has been blahblahblahing the worshippers of blahblahblah for x number of years" (or any of the innumerable variations thereupon) argument. That's not the issue here. The issue is inherent hypocrisy. In short, knock it the hell off.

Now, on to Gender neutrality.

I will be the first to admit we of the male half of the species have been - by and large but by no means all - enormous assheads since pretty much day one. But if I hear or see the phrase "Gender neutral" one more gaddam time, I am going to snap.

Guess what, folks - we have different genders. Deal with it. I am entirely weary of the efforts of some of our citizenry to make this society we live in seemingly as bland and as featureless as Pat Boone music.

I mean.. "sie"? "Hir"? (Don't even get me started on "Zie") By changing one letter, it's supposed to redress the balance? No, it just simply makes you look like you can't spell.



Ah. That's better.

Date: 2002-12-16 07:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gridlore.livejournal.com
When dealing with pronouns in print, I just use the male as a default, unless it is specified that I am talking about a female. This is how the English language works, folks. Having attempted to learn French, I really don't want to have to gender-split all the verbs and come up with really weird GN fixes for everything.

Dungeons & Dragons 3rd Ed. took a lot of fire for using different gender pronouns throughout the books. In the Classes chapter of the Players Handbook they had example characters for the different classes, and used the correct pronoun for that character for examples in the rest of the book. Both the example Sorcerer and Wizard were female, so all pronouns relating to arcane magic were female. I had no problem with this, but it really pissed some people off.

Feh. If sexual reproduction wasn't so much fun, I'd say go back to asexual fissio

March 2016

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 13th, 2025 10:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios