Of all the cheap )(&*@#@&

[docwebster]

Note to TV Guide on your new format: It sucks great big sweaty hairy donkey testicles.

Here's another note: If I wanted to read People magazine or that bastion of journalistic integrity the Star, I'd have subscribed to them, you mindless assholes. I subcribe to TV Guide for program listings and what used to be informative articles, not to have to leaf the sixty plus _!)*@& pages before I get to even one _+!)*@@#& program listing, and that a pale imitation of what used to be!

When I say pale, I mean pale. It's all pastels and light, frothy little tones now. !_)@*#^^^ that for a lark, and to the people responsible for this leap of marketing logic I'd remind you of the last time a beloved company tried to change their taste and formula: New Coke.

Swivel on it, !@*#&&&lips!

Comments

[sunruner.livejournal.com]

No, really, tell us how you really feel. :)

[tamdragon.livejournal.com]

LOL

Maybe use the tv guide that's in the newspaper from this point forward...or maybe, if you have cable use that programming station for all your needs...or better yet, put this exact post in an email and email them :)

[darthgeek.livejournal.com]

http://www.tvguide.com or http://tv.yahoo.com

Doesn't have the articles, but, it has the listings.

[rosefox]

http://www.adrants.com/2005/10/pointlessly-tv-guide-relaunches.php

[beki.livejournal.com]

Did you write them? A couple of the folks I work with did. They also said that if they wanted "What's Hot Magazine" they would have bought a subscription to that instead. They had also wrote that if this was how it was going to continue going, they would cancel their subscriptions.