The president pushed another hot-button issue for conservatives when he said would continue to nominate to the courts like minded-judges who "will interpret the law, and not legislate from the bench."
By this he means judges that fully agree with everything the other two branches of government do which by default negates the checks and balences built into the governments design by having three branches.
Any judge who does not "interpret" the law by fully endorsing it instead of rulling in favor of a constitution and negating the law is odviously "legislating" from the bench.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-03-11 12:17 pm (UTC)I don't think you're approaching this at all with an open mind.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-11 02:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-11 02:25 pm (UTC)By this he means judges that fully agree with everything the other two branches of government do which by default negates the checks and balences built into the governments design by having three branches.
Any judge who does not "interpret" the law by fully endorsing it instead of rulling in favor of a constitution and negating the law is odviously "legislating" from the bench.
This is what is pissing me off!
no subject
Date: 2004-03-12 05:20 am (UTC)I tell you, I'm a Christian (PRO-CHOICE, though, of COURSE!!!), and I'm scared. Very scared.
My new mantra is:
"Shrub: Out the door in 2004".
Kim