docwebster ([personal profile] docwebster) wrote2005-03-24 09:48 am

That's that.

Hot off the press - the Supremes refuse to intervene. The decision to remove the tube stands.

[identity profile] midnightmadness.livejournal.com 2005-03-24 03:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Damn activist judges!!!
yendi: (Default)

[personal profile] yendi 2005-03-24 03:54 pm (UTC)(link)
That actually impresses me a little -- since I think it still only takes two Supremes to decide to hear a case, that means that even Scalia and his butt-buddy didn't go for this one.

[identity profile] lbcboy232.livejournal.com 2005-03-24 04:21 pm (UTC)(link)
thank god. this whole thing is so pathetic.

it's pissed me off almost to the point of a ranting political entry, but i usually leaves those up to you ;)

[identity profile] bunyip.livejournal.com 2005-03-24 04:52 pm (UTC)(link)
I thought this would happen, but the screams of judicial tyrany* etc will be forthcoming.

* Religious Right code word for we don't like this decision because it goes against what our bible says, see also judicial activism </sarcasm>

[identity profile] auryn29a.livejournal.com 2005-03-24 04:52 pm (UTC)(link)
My first thought: "Huh? What does Diana Ross have to do with it?"

[identity profile] drake57.livejournal.com 2005-03-24 07:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah i didn't think Diana Ross would make a decision...